Wanting a fretless Gibson SG
#1
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:21 PM
I am new to this forum. I play fretless bass, guitar and double bass. So wanting to dive into fretless guitar territories isn't a grazy thought for me.
I was thinking about defretting (or having defret) a Gibson SG. I have several (noob) questions on this:
1) Is it better to buy a guitar with an ebony neck? or is better to use epoxy on the fingerboard? in the last case I don't think the fingerboard wood does matter?
2) how much will a luthier generally charge for a defret job?
3) what gauge strings are mostly used for fretless guitar? and do they need to be flatwound? or will normal string also do the job without eating the fingerbaord too much?
4) do you prefer fretlines or not? and why?
#2
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:39 PM
To try and answer the questions:
1 - Ebony is best. No experience of epoxy, if used the wood would be less important. Give a thought to replacing the entire fingerboard, not as difficult as it seems.
2 - The trouble is finding a luthier that will take you seriously and know how to set up a fretless
3 - I like heavier gauges but others go for light strings. Flat wound are kinder to the fingerboard, and also have the advantage of being fairly friction free if you are sliding your fingers a lot.
4 - Fretlines are good to tell where the notes are, but a plain fingerboard looks very cool.
#3
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:36 PM
I think the best is to find a SG with an ebony fingerboard then. Epoxy is very hard and will not wear out much but it has different sound, on bass that is. Don't know if epoxy is used a lot for fretless guitar boards.
I have had both unlined and lined necks on bass. But I prefer a lined neck now. Unlined looks better but a lined neck is much easier on the intonation.
Especially if you also want to be able to play some small chords.
On my double bass I have and unlined neck but that is a totally different instrument of course.
#4
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:31 PM
But you might consider the complete fingerboard replacement since many luthiers can do that and you will have a smoother board, without so much effort. It might even be possible to save the old fingerboard complete with all frets and binding by this way. With a replacement unslotted fingerboard, position markers or even a mark for each fret can be painted or inlaid on the side edge of the fingerboard.
Some players like heavy strings and flatwound strings. I use light roundwound ones. Ernie Ball Super Slinky Roundwound. .009 E treble string. With such a set, I doubt roundwound strings will ever hurt my fretless guitars fingerboards. Many years ago I used Ernie Ball Power Slinkies Roundwound, .011 E treble string. Those roundwound strings also never hurt my fretless guitars.
www.facebook.com/3pupsmusic
www.reverbnation.com/3pupsmusic
www.youtube.com/3pupsmusic
www.cafepress.com/3pupsmusic
www.archive.org/search.php?query=3pupsmusic
#5
Posted 09 February 2012 - 05:08 PM
Quote
Neither my Godins nor my Strat have fretlines. (The Godins have fret-type marks on the side, the Strat, which has a Warmoth replacement neck installed by previous owner Tom Baker, has only dot markers on the side.) I find their side markings more than sufficient as reference. After a while you'll find that your motor memory guides your intonation pretty well anyway. I can sometimes play with my eyes closed. Any intonation skill violinists, cellists, etc. can develop we can too. (Truth be told, I think my intonation is better than some career string players I know.)
One advantage of a unlined board, since your audience can't usually see the side markings, is that it makes you look even more impressive than otherwise ("How is he finding the notes?!")
[url="http://soundcloud.com/csharporchestra"]C# Orchestra on Soundcloud[/url]
#6
Posted 12 February 2012 - 02:52 PM
Kai, on 09 February 2012 - 05:08 PM, said:
You are right. An unlined fretboard looks better and more impressive. But I think most people will play much more in tune with fretlines and that's more important than looks.
I think fretlines will help your intonation a lot when you want to play small chords or double stops.
#7
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:50 AM
les fret, on 12 February 2012 - 02:52 PM, said:
Kai, on 09 February 2012 - 05:08 PM, said:
You are right. An unlined fretboard looks better and more impressive. But I think most people will play much more in tune with fretlines and that's more important than looks.
I think fretlines will help your intonation a lot when you want to play small chords or double stops.
You're right about chords & double stops - I rarely do those in my style. (No chords in Indian music.) While the side marks are enough to guide one finger at a time, there's a lot more to position in relation to them when doing two or more notes. (I've noticed that string players who do double stops and chords tend to get away with a lot more dodgy intonation, but guitar brings with it an expectation of precise intonation that violin. etc., doesn't. Which reminds me of the viola joke: what do you call two violists playing a unison? A minor second.)
It's probably still possible after a long time to do them without looking, but, yes, the motor memory challenge is much greater. Tim Donahue and Gazza both could probably say a lot more about that.
[url="http://soundcloud.com/csharporchestra"]C# Orchestra on Soundcloud[/url]
#8
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:16 AM
Kai, on 14 February 2012 - 04:50 AM, said:
It's probably still possible after a long time to do them without looking, but, yes, the motor memory challenge is much greater. Tim Donahue and Gazza both could probably say a lot more about that.
The sheer number of viola jokes in the classical world runs only second to drummer jokes in the rock world. (must investigate why)
See Tim Donahue's section on chords in his tutorial published on Unfretted.
The lines will give you a guide esp. with chords but they can be a double edged sword. As an example, in a major chord in just intonation the third will be 14 cents flat of the actual fret line position. So its fine to use finger shapes where the third is slightly flat. If it is sounded slightly sharp it is a little offensive. So some chord intervals will stand being a little "out" while others will stick out like a sore thumb.
In time you will find your ear will guide your intonation with single notes and chords.
Or you could buy a viola
#9
Posted 21 February 2012 - 03:42 AM
jahloon, on 14 February 2012 - 10:16 AM, said:
"Whaddaya call a guy who hangs out with musicians?" (My personal favourite, despite having played with some consummate musicians who are drummers.)
[url="http://soundcloud.com/csharporchestra"]C# Orchestra on Soundcloud[/url]
#10
Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:13 AM
#11
Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:33 AM
I think it was really to put Vigier firmly into the boutique area of guitars along with Suhr etc.
Not a bad thing because Vigiers are absolutely first class instruments and were possibly underpriced compared to similar quality instruments.
The value of the instrument is down to what the seller wants for it. Recently I've had two Vigiers were the sellers wanted 2000+ GBP and I would consider that way too high in the present economic climate.
I bought mine for 800 GBP in 2004, which I reckoned was a fair price from a retail shop.
If I had to replace it with a second hand model I would not want to pay more than 1200 GBP and considerably less if the manufacture date was pre 2004.
Additionally the new models are now on the market with new metal boards that require less maintenance.
Not played one yet so could not say wether this would decrease the price of older delta metal models.
Either way the Vigier is one of the best fretless guitar you can purchase.
#12
Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:50 AM
The guy who sells it doesn't like the feel of the metal fingerboard. I have heard this from other users as well.
So I am curious if I will like it. Can't wait!

Help












